Friday, June 22, 2007

Tale of Two Elections

This was the headline that appeared in a recent editorial in The Purcellville Gazette. The writer poses some very interesting thoughts that should be considered carefully by the Loudoun County Republican party leadership. On May 19th the Republican Party held a “firehouse” primary to pick the Republican candidate to oppose Senator Mark Herring for the 33rd State Senate district. A firehouse primary is a traditional election with ballots and voting machines at precincts in the district. Any registered voter can go to the polls at their convenience on Primary Election Day and vote for the candidate of their choice. A similar primary was held for the 27th Senate district on June 12th to pick a Republican candidate for this district. These were the first of the “Two Elections”

Instead of a Firehouse Primary that was held in the 27th and 33rd districts, the leadership of the Loudoun County Republican Committee (LCRC) chose to hold a convention on June 9th to elect candidates to run for the Board of Supervisors, Clerk of the Court, and Sherriff. A convention is a closed process as prospective delegates must register in advance, sign a pledge to support the candidates elected by the convention, and spend four to six hours at the convention before voting. At the June 9th Convention only 1,497 (50%) of the registered delegates showed up on a beautiful spring day.

In the Firehouse primaries 7,923 (4.5%) voted in the 27th district, and 1,469 (1%) voted in the 33rd district. (These were embarrassingly low percentages.) I voted in both - the 27th district primary and at the LCRC convention. It took me less than five minutes to vote on the 12th, but I spent five hours at the convention on the 9th before I voted and there were many delegates still there when I left.

Conventions can have benefits for a political party. Inspirational speeches can inspire the party’s faithful, provide a forum for open debate on the issues, and give the candidates an opportunity to explain why they are the best choice for the nomination. (I regret that this does not happen at National conventions, which have morphed into giant pep rallies.)

I have heard from many who feel the LCRC convention was exclusive, and that the process was controlled by a very few with an agenda that may not be in sync with the majority. Once the convention votes were tallied, the losers should have congratulated the winners and pledged their support. Instead two delegates who lost and one who was not even a candidate, in a shameful act, broke their pledges and declared they would run as Independents – decisions celebrated with champagne and fireworks by the Democrats. (Chick here for an example.) Would a Firehouse primary have been better and a more democratic (note the small “d”) option?

The LCRC leadership should look in the mirror and talk to the problem.

(Click here to read The Purcellville Gazette editorial.)

No comments: